HTTP/2 Multiplexing vs Old School Domain Sharding - Free Page Speed Improvements
Today I am going to teach you why Domain Sharding is an outdated web performance technique.
The best part is this technique wont cost you a dime and is simple to turn on.
Recently Brian Dean posted a nice article on performing an SEO audit. He covered many good points, including a token section on performance.
Like most online marketers Brian pointed out optimizing images, fast server... simple things that are tangible.
The sad thing is these common points provide minimal impact on your page rendering profile.
Seriously, we're talking less than 10%.
Brian admits he is not a technical person and 'wisely' avoided going too deep in this area.
Well, I am technical and love going deep in web performance optimization, so I am about to dive into the topic of domain sharding vs HTTP/2.
I chose this point because Manish Dhiman asked about it in the article comments, domain sharding.
OMG 'Domain Sharding'!
This sounds technical...not that much.
Let's learn about it and what you should do today instead.
What is Domain Sharding?
in 2007 I grabbed a book that changed my developer trajectory forever, 'High Performance Web Site's by Steve Souders.
I reviewed my signed (yeah, I am that cool) copy while writing this article. The book's content still holds up today, so still a great reference to how to architect fast websites.
At the time Steve worked at Yahoo and had a team examine the top 10 web sites to analyze what they did to render fast. From that they created the old FireFox YSlow plugin and eventually HTTPArchive.
At the time a best practice was to segment page/site assets across different domains. This was a hack to 'trick' browsers into opening more parallel connections.
When you dive into the HTTP specification you learn user agents/clients (that would be the browser to normal folks) should only open 1 or 2 connections to the server. This causes a problem because most pages require numerous assets to load.
Backlinko needs well over 300...I'll address that issue in another post.
This begs the question, 'how many resources will a browser download from a given domain at a time?'
Because most pages are, and I am going to be brutally honest here, poorly designed, browser vendors (Microsoft, Google, FireFox, Opera, etc) decided to break the spec and open up to 6 (I think one might have even gone to 8) simultaneous connections per domain. This was not always true, and many mobile browsers stuck to the specification because cellular connections are weak and unreliable.
One reason why the HTTP/1.1 specification limited connections to 2 was to limit the amount of server congestion. Remember servers were not as sophisticated back then and did not have the beefy hardware we enjoy today.
This technique does not improve actual rendering times, that is another blog post (so much to cover here 😋), just how fast responses could be loaded across the network.
Yeah, problem solved...sort of.
Remember this is a hack perpetuated by both browser vendors and webmasters.
Hacks are not permanent solutions!
HTTP/2 To the Rescue
Anytime geeks get together and draft specifications we write rules to cover the known universe. Inevitably the known universe changes, so we update the specs and make new versions.
Back in the 2012 timeframe Google led an effort to update the HTTP specification and released a new protocol called SPDY.
SPDY was a prototype of what evolved into HTTP/2, the latest version of HTTP. To sum up the new version it fixed much of what was 'wrong' with HTTP/1.1, where you needed to domain shard and many other things.
Let's focus on request multiplexing (caution big word in play).
A major HTTP/2 feature is the ability to multiplex responses in a single conection.
Unlike HTTP/1.1 a single connection between the client and server is created. This reduced overhead associated with creating new connections.
Trust me, the new connection process is expensive.
In a 2013 blog post, Souders revisits the need to domain shard. If you read the article, remember this is 2013, before HTTP/2 was specified and SPDY was the emerging idea.
In his summary he concluded the following:
"There’s no need for domain sharding in the world of HTTP 2.0 across all popular browsers."
That's because HTTP/2 can return multiple files at the same time using a single connection.
Let's look at Backlinko's waterfall:
OK, let's get past the number of requests (don't have that many requests by the way), but look at how vertical the request timeline is.
Each request to Backlinko's CDN starts at the same time. Optin Monster's requests are also multiplexed. You can also see several requests to other domains that do not have HTTP/2 turned on, those requests are staggered (displayed as a slant).
These staggered requests are serial, which means each request has to wait for the previous request to complete before it can be started. This takes time, lots of time.
There is a tradeoff to sharding, creating connections.
Creating a new HTTP connection is 'expensive'. This means it takes time to resolve DNS, complete the ACK/NACK part of the conection protocol, etc. This affects what we call RTT (round trip time).
This is why research back in the pre-HTTP/2 days recommended only sharding over 2 domains. After that the benefits were erased with the extra overhead.
There are many other benefits of HTTP/2, but to me multiplexing is the best feature.
So how do you utilize HTTP/2?
Most web servers now support HTTP/2. But honestly the server should not need to be configured, you should use a CDN for your site.
"HTTP/2 is a protocol designed for low-latency transport of content over the World Wide Web"
Any Content Delivery Network provider should have HTTP/2 as an option. I use AWS CloudFront and it is literally a checkbox to toggle on or off (on is always the right choice in my opinion).
I can't emphasize enough using a CDN. When High Performance Websites was first published, a CDN was recommended. I investigated this option and quickly backed away as they were expensive. Today CDN services are a commodity. I pay a few cents each month for CloudFront.
Setting up a CDN is a bit technical, so maybe another article??
In general, your existing server should serve as an origin and the CDN distributes your assets around the globe for you.
FYI, Brian does not need to spend $200/month on a server. I could not believe he spends that much, I was not even spending that much 10 years ago, and I still had physical servers in a data center #oldschool.
Don't worry, legacy browsers that no one should be using in the first place can still fetch from your server. When a client does not support HTTP/2 the protocol falls back to HTTP/1.1 standards. So, you are safe.
HTTP/2 does require HTTPS, which any serious site uses, so this should not be an issue either.
I am glad Manish asked Brian the domain sharding question. I had been meaning to share how to use HTTP/2 multiplexing for a while now.
To answer Manish's question, no don't use sub-domains or multiple domains anymore. Instead use a server, really a CDN, with HTTP/2 support on a single domain. Your page assets will load much faster and the time and cost required to maintain multiple servers and domains is eliminated.
I hope this knowledge helps you make your site faster.
Now, it’s time to look to the next article inspired by Brain's post, how to fix Backlinko's 18+ second load time!!!